chrisruzin.net :: Ronald Reagan Dies (June 5, 2004)

“have you ever met him.

he was a film star, who had the experience to use propaganda at its max, e.g. Arnie films and stalone films showing how bad every other county is.”

It’s funny that moonbats from all over use the “actor” card immediately with Ronald Reagan. As if his being an actor before meant he was never really a genuine person at all in his life. Most moonbats have never met a real actor either, but they claim to be experts on their lives. I guarantee sirwan never met Reagan either, yet he spews out bile as if he knew the “real” Reagan.

If you think Arnie/Stallone films are all about portraying other countries as bad, then that’s what you want to read into them. Anyone who is intellectually honest will know that’s a load of tripe.

“The poor inoccent africans dying with no food deserve the one minute silence not him. He manipulated the american people into thinking of his ways on war.”

Oh yes… Africans are all “poor” and “innocent”. They’ve never committed any atrocities against each other. It’s just a giant utopian continent that has been destroyed by evil whitey. If you truly believe that, then you don’t know jack about African history. I’m not an eminent scholar on it either, but I at least know that Africa has been torn apart by wars for as long as their history goes back. I suspect sirwan knows this too, but won’t admit it.

It’s also funny that in the minds of foamy-mouth moonbats African troubles are never the fault of their messed up African governments, nor even the fault of European countries who have (ex)colonies in Africa, but of the Americans. In fact, ALL world problems are direct results of America in their minds. It’s a sickness of the mind, really, to be so fixated with one country… to so hate one country that nothing they do can ever be good. They claim that we’re brainwashed, yet the only thing they “know” about America is how “evil” it is. Who are the brainwashed ones?

And explain to me how one man can “manipulate” almost 200 million people into believing “his ways on war”? Manipulate a people who pride themselves on their freedoms and ability to make their own decisions. The answer is you can’t because he didn’t. It’s impossible.

“He sold the nuclear war heads to saddam which he used to kill the kurds. He constantly sold him masses of weapons which saddam then used to invade kuwait.”

This statement shows just how much sirwan doesn’t know. Saddam didn’t use nukes on the Kurds. He used chemical weapons. And sirwan either has forgotten or won’t admit that European countries were also selling weapons to Saddam. The Soviets were backing Iran and giving them weapons, so the Western countries backed Iraq. In fact, the closest thing to a country selling nukes to Saddam would’ve been France’s dealings with Saddam, since they sold him (and built it for him!) a nuclear plant.

Were Western dealings with Saddam a good thing to do? Who can really say definitively? Yes and no both work. If no weapons were given to Saddam, most likely Soviet-backed Iran would’ve killed countless more innocent people while taking over a gigantic chunk of the world’s oil supply and the Soviet Union would probably still be around.

Another interesting observation is that “sophisticated” moonbats like to crow that the world and it’s politics is a complex affair. No black and white. No good and evil. Yet that logic somehow doesn’t apply to anything the US does. That’s always evil. Always black. Please…

“You being an american probably wont even post this on the site. but i hope yo do, to show how your site can bring powerful opinions and can all most be educational.”

There’s a classic example of baiting someone. Mock their history, president, people AND nationality, but then claim you’re just trying to better them. Notice he says that if I respond, my site can “almost be educational” (I corrected the spelling for him). Now it really is educational, since he’ll know how to spell it in the future.

Nice strawman, Dave S. NOWHERE did either of us say anything like we Americans are the saviors of the world. NOWHERE did we say we’ve never been the bad guys. What we DID say was that we are sick of the rest of the world always painting us as the bad guys. Like you said, “put yourself in our shoes” for a moment. Imagine the entire world, practically, always harping on how bad your country was. How evil everything you do is. If that were true, then we’d have nuked the rest of the world long ago.

How do you equate a flag in a movie as either arrogant or sufficient a motive to provoke a war?! If seeing another countries flag in a movie makes you want to go to war with them, then I think you have issues. You won’t see a flag in every movie or show, that’s a stupid statement. You shouldn’t guarantee something you have no clue about.

Your last paragraph is so ridiculous, it’s almost funny. I don’t see England mourning and throwing on sack cloth for the woes of the rest of the world either. In fact, I don’t see any country doing what you expect America to do. You can’t tell me England wouldn’t react in the same way if planes were flown into Parliament and Buckingham Palace, killing thousands of innocent people in the process.

Dave S., first thing… learn to spell. Second thing… learn basic English grammar. Both of those will greatly help people’s impressions of you and your opinions. As it is now, you really do look like a pissed-off teen who knows jack #### about America.

Yeah, we Americans are “wrapped in wool” (whatever that means) and don’t know the horrible pain the rest of the world is feeling. Last I saw, England was pretty much wrapped in wool too.

I see now that your limp-wrist arguments are getting shot down, you’re resorting to yelling and name calling. That’s always a great way to prove how intelligent and correct your viewpoint is.

I hope terrorists feel a lot of pain when they get bombed in Afghanistan. They certainly don’t give a flip about dishing out pain, fear and death to others.

I’m not saying there’s tons of destruction going on in America. Really… where are you pulling these things from? Oh, nevermind. I think I know. And Bush stealing oil (the dreaded “O” word, liquid evil to all moonbats of the world) from Iraq is stupid. Back it up with proof, Dave. It’s very easy to spout a bunch of crap without any proof.

“Millions of points I’m vague on”. I didn’t know I had made a million points.

Dave S. or Tony, since you’re the same person… you know, all caps really makes you look like an ass. Throw in the name calling, and I can just picture you in real life screaming to the top of your lungs with a vein popping out on your forehead. Eyes bulging, foam building around the edges of your mouth because you’re beginning to realize the other person thinks you’re a joke and your arguments (if that’s what you want to call them) are absurd. Now, to answer your last post…

Once again, you’re pretending I said something I didn’t. Where did I say you liked terrorists?

Finally, a point you’re correct on. After 9/11, America did change. So did the entire political world. Learn to live with it, because it’s not going to go back to how it was. And no, racism isn’t worse than it used to be.

If we pull our troops out of there, we will be abandoning a baby democracy to the wolves that surround it. We would once again let the Iraqi people down and they would forever hate the Western world.

The soldiers who did the crap at Abu Ghraib were punished for what they did, and deservedly so. Every single one of them. That’s how I explain that. Since we’re on the topic of soldiers doing bad things, explain to me why UN “peacekeepers” haven’t been punished for raping and sexually exploiting refugees in Africa? And filming it too.